Skip to content

Altis vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 1 and 596 real audits

MetricAltisDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance2832DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8387DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7781DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO10091Altis
Security6564Altis
TTFB781ms339msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Altis
28
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
Altis
83
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
Altis
65
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
Altis
100
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
Altis
72
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Altis in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Altis leads in SEO, security.

When to choose Altis

Choose Altis when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Altis sites and 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Altis or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Altis or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Altis sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Altis or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Altis or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Altis sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Altis or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (339 ms vs 781 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Altis or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while Altis may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback