Skip to content

Altis vs Facebook

Based on 1 and 1417 real audits

View Altis details | View Facebook details
MetricAltisFacebookWinner
Performance2838Facebook
Accessibility8389Facebook
Best Practices7784Facebook
SEO10090Altis
Security6567Facebook
TTFB781ms280msFacebook
Composite7273Facebook
Performance
Altis
28
Facebook
38
Accessibility
Altis
83
Facebook
89
Security
Altis
65
Facebook
67
SEO
Altis
100
Facebook
90
Composite
Altis
72
Facebook
73

Facebook outperforms Altis in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Altis leads in SEO.

When to choose Altis

Choose Altis when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Altis sites and 1417 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Altis or Facebook?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Altis or Facebook?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Altis or Facebook?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Altis or Facebook?
Altis sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Altis or Facebook?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (280 ms vs 781 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Altis or Facebook for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Altis may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback