| Metric | Altis | Rybbit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 28 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 83 | 83 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 77 | 77 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 781ms | 781ms | Tie |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Altis and Rybbit are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Altis has a composite score of 72 while Rybbit scores 72.
Altis doesn't clearly lead Rybbit in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Rybbit doesn't clearly lead Altis in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Altis sites and 1 audited Rybbit sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback