Based on 254 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Advertising | Instana | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 47 | Instana |
| Accessibility | 87 | 100 | Instana |
| Best Practices | 80 | 86 | Instana |
| SEO | 91 | 96 | Instana |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Amazon Advertising |
| TTFB | 273ms | 85ms | Instana |
| Composite | 71 | 74 | Instana |
Instana outperforms Amazon Advertising in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Amazon Advertising leads in security.
Choose Amazon Advertising when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Instana when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 254 audited Amazon Advertising sites and 2 audited Instana sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback