Based on 253 and 51 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Advertising | OpenX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 27 | Amazon Advertising |
| Accessibility | 87 | 85 | Amazon Advertising |
| Best Practices | 79 | 76 | Amazon Advertising |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Amazon Advertising |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 274ms | 341ms | Amazon Advertising |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Amazon Advertising outperforms OpenX in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 71). OpenX leads in no categories.
Choose Amazon Advertising when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
OpenX doesn't clearly lead Amazon Advertising in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 253 audited Amazon Advertising sites and 51 audited OpenX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback