Based on 50 and 891 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ALB | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 38 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 86 | 89 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | Amazon Web Services |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 64 | 67 | Amazon Web Services |
| TTFB | 454ms | 335ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Amazon Web Services |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Amazon ALB in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Amazon ALB leads in no categories.
Amazon ALB doesn't clearly lead Amazon Web Services in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 50 audited Amazon ALB sites and 891 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback