Based on 48 and 818 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ALB | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 38 | Amazon ALB |
| Accessibility | 86 | 89 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | Amazon Web Services |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Amazon Web Services |
| TTFB | 464ms | 311ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Amazon ALB in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Amazon ALB leads in performance.
Choose Amazon ALB when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 48 audited Amazon ALB sites and 818 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback