Based on 46 and 453 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ALB | Apache HTTP Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 50 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Accessibility | 86 | 87 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 85 | 88 | Apache HTTP Server |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 65 | Apache HTTP Server |
| TTFB | 460ms | 551ms | Amazon ALB |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Apache HTTP Server |
Apache HTTP Server outperforms Amazon ALB in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Amazon ALB leads in TTFB.
Choose Amazon ALB when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 46 audited Amazon ALB sites and 453 audited Apache HTTP Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback