Skip to content

Amazon ALB vs core-js

Based on 50 and 1849 real audits

View Amazon ALB details | View core-js details
MetricAmazon ALBcore-jsWinner
Performance3836Amazon ALB
Accessibility8688core-js
Best Practices8585Tie
SEO9091core-js
Security6467core-js
TTFB454ms438mscore-js
Composite7274core-js
Performance
Amazon ALB
38
core-js
36
Accessibility
Amazon ALB
86
core-js
88
Security
Amazon ALB
64
core-js
67
SEO
Amazon ALB
90
core-js
91
Composite
Amazon ALB
72
core-js
74

core-js outperforms Amazon ALB in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon ALB leads in performance.

When to choose Amazon ALB

Choose Amazon ALB when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 50 audited Amazon ALB sites and 1849 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon ALB or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon ALB sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon ALB or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon ALB or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon ALB or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon ALB or core-js?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (438 ms vs 454 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon ALB or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon ALB scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon ALB may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback