Based on 47 and 1938 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ALB | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 41 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 86 | 87 | Google Analytics |
| Best Practices | 85 | 85 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Google Analytics |
| Security | 64 | 65 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 467ms | 406ms | Google Analytics |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Google Analytics |
Google Analytics outperforms Amazon ALB in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Amazon ALB leads in no categories.
Amazon ALB doesn't clearly lead Google Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 47 audited Amazon ALB sites and 1938 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback