Based on 48 and 1812 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ALB | Google Workspace | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 45 | Google Workspace |
| Accessibility | 86 | 88 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | Google Workspace |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 67 | Google Workspace |
| TTFB | 464ms | 283ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Google Workspace |
Google Workspace outperforms Amazon ALB in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Amazon ALB leads in no categories.
Amazon ALB doesn't clearly lead Google Workspace in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 48 audited Amazon ALB sites and 1812 audited Google Workspace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback