Skip to content

Amazon ALB vs HSTS

Based on 46 and 2556 real audits

View Amazon ALB details | View HSTS details
MetricAmazon ALBHSTSWinner
Performance3949HSTS
Accessibility8689HSTS
Best Practices8588HSTS
SEO9091HSTS
Security6370HSTS
TTFB460ms364msHSTS
Composite7175HSTS
Performance
Amazon ALB
39
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Amazon ALB
86
HSTS
89
Security
Amazon ALB
63
HSTS
70
SEO
Amazon ALB
90
HSTS
91
Composite
Amazon ALB
71
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Amazon ALB in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). Amazon ALB leads in no categories.

When to choose Amazon ALB

Amazon ALB doesn't clearly lead HSTS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 46 audited Amazon ALB sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon ALB or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon ALB or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon ALB or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon ALB or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon ALB or HSTS?
HSTS sites show lower Time to First Byte (364 ms vs 460 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon ALB or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon ALB may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback