Based on 49 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ALB | mod_python | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 30 | Amazon ALB |
| Accessibility | 86 | 95 | mod_python |
| Best Practices | 85 | 77 | Amazon ALB |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | mod_python |
| Security | 64 | 58 | Amazon ALB |
| TTFB | 460ms | 339ms | mod_python |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Amazon ALB |
Amazon ALB outperforms mod_python in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). mod_python leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Amazon ALB when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose mod_python when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 49 audited Amazon ALB sites and 1 audited mod_python sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback