Skip to content

Amazon Associates vs HSTS

Based on 5 and 2556 real audits

View Amazon Associates details | View HSTS details
MetricAmazon AssociatesHSTSWinner
Performance3849HSTS
Accessibility9189Amazon Associates
Best Practices8588HSTS
SEO9391Amazon Associates
Security6970HSTS
TTFB89ms364msAmazon Associates
Composite7375HSTS
Performance
Amazon Associates
38
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Amazon Associates
91
HSTS
89
Security
Amazon Associates
69
HSTS
70
SEO
Amazon Associates
93
HSTS
91
Composite
Amazon Associates
73
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Amazon Associates in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Amazon Associates leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Amazon Associates

Choose Amazon Associates when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 5 audited Amazon Associates sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Associates or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Associates or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Associates or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Associates (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Associates or HSTS?
Amazon Associates sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Associates or HSTS?
Amazon Associates sites show lower Time to First Byte (89 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Associates or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Associates may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback