Based on 432 and 833 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudFront | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 38 | Amazon CloudFront |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 262ms | 312ms | Amazon CloudFront |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Amazon CloudFront |
Amazon CloudFront outperforms Amazon Web Services in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in no categories.
Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Amazon Web Services doesn't clearly lead Amazon CloudFront in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 432 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 833 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback