Skip to content

Amazon CloudFront vs Amazon Web Services

Based on 419 and 806 real audits

View Amazon CloudFront details | View Amazon Web Services details
MetricAmazon CloudFrontAmazon Web ServicesWinner
Performance3938Amazon CloudFront
Accessibility8889Amazon Web Services
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6666Tie
TTFB240ms299msAmazon CloudFront
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Amazon CloudFront
39
Amazon Web Services
38
Accessibility
Amazon CloudFront
88
Amazon Web Services
89
Security
Amazon CloudFront
66
Amazon Web Services
66
SEO
Amazon CloudFront
91
Amazon Web Services
91
Composite
Amazon CloudFront
72
Amazon Web Services
72

Amazon CloudFront outperforms Amazon Web Services in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in accessibility.

When to choose Amazon CloudFront

Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Amazon Web Services

Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 419 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon CloudFront or Amazon Web Services?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon CloudFront or Amazon Web Services?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon CloudFront or Amazon Web Services?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Web Services (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon CloudFront or Amazon Web Services?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon CloudFront or Amazon Web Services?
Amazon CloudFront sites show lower Time to First Byte (240 ms vs 299 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon CloudFront or Amazon Web Services for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon CloudFront scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback