Based on 447 and 448 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudFront | AWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 39 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 67 | AWS |
| TTFB | 263ms | 262ms | AWS |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
AWS outperforms Amazon CloudFront in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Amazon CloudFront leads in no categories.
Amazon CloudFront doesn't clearly lead AWS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose AWS when your primary concern is security and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 447 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 448 audited AWS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback