Based on 414 and 414 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudFront | AWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 39 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon CloudFront |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 234ms | 234ms | Tie |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Amazon CloudFront outperforms AWS in 1 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). AWS leads in no categories.
Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
AWS doesn't clearly lead Amazon CloudFront in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 414 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 414 audited AWS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback