Based on 419 and 401 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudFront | AWS CloudFront | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 39 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | AWS CloudFront |
| Best Practices | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 240ms | 238ms | AWS CloudFront |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
AWS CloudFront outperforms Amazon CloudFront in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Amazon CloudFront leads in no categories.
Amazon CloudFront doesn't clearly lead AWS CloudFront in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 419 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 401 audited AWS CloudFront sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback