Skip to content

Amazon CloudFront vs Google Analytics

Based on 419 and 1936 real audits

View Amazon CloudFront details | View Google Analytics details
MetricAmazon CloudFrontGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance3941Google Analytics
Accessibility8887Amazon CloudFront
Best Practices8785Amazon CloudFront
SEO9191Tie
Security6665Amazon CloudFront
TTFB240ms406msAmazon CloudFront
Composite7273Google Analytics
Performance
Amazon CloudFront
39
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Amazon CloudFront
88
Google Analytics
87
Security
Amazon CloudFront
66
Google Analytics
65
SEO
Amazon CloudFront
91
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Amazon CloudFront
72
Google Analytics
73

Amazon CloudFront outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, composite score.

When to choose Amazon CloudFront

Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 419 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 1936 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon CloudFront or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon CloudFront or Google Analytics?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon CloudFront or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon CloudFront (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon CloudFront or Google Analytics?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon CloudFront or Google Analytics?
Amazon CloudFront sites show lower Time to First Byte (240 ms vs 406 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon CloudFront or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback