Based on 419 and 2547 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudFront | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 39 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Amazon CloudFront |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | Amazon CloudFront |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Amazon CloudFront |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Amazon CloudFront |
| TTFB | 240ms | 375ms | Amazon CloudFront |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Google Tag Manager |
Amazon CloudFront outperforms Google Tag Manager in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Google Tag Manager leads in composite score.
Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Tag Manager doesn't clearly lead Amazon CloudFront in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 419 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 2547 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback