Skip to content

Amazon CloudFront vs HSTS

Based on 453 and 3637 real audits

View Amazon CloudFront details | View HSTS details
MetricAmazon CloudFrontHSTSWinner
Performance3954HSTS
Accessibility8990HSTS
Best Practices8790HSTS
SEO9192HSTS
Security6774HSTS
TTFB261ms421msAmazon CloudFront
Composite7378HSTS
Performance
Amazon CloudFront
39
HSTS
54
Accessibility
Amazon CloudFront
89
HSTS
90
Security
Amazon CloudFront
67
HSTS
74
SEO
Amazon CloudFront
91
HSTS
92
Composite
Amazon CloudFront
73
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Amazon CloudFront in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Amazon CloudFront leads in TTFB.

When to choose Amazon CloudFront

Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 453 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 3637 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon CloudFront or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon CloudFront or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon CloudFront or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon CloudFront or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon CloudFront or HSTS?
Amazon CloudFront sites show lower Time to First Byte (261 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon CloudFront or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback