Based on 419 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudFront | Lemon Squeezy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 56 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Best Practices | 87 | 96 | Lemon Squeezy |
| SEO | 91 | 83 | Amazon CloudFront |
| Security | 66 | 59 | Amazon CloudFront |
| TTFB | 240ms | 242ms | Amazon CloudFront |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Amazon CloudFront and Lemon Squeezy are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon CloudFront has a composite score of 72 while Lemon Squeezy scores 72.
Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lemon Squeezy when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 419 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 1 audited Lemon Squeezy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback