Skip to content

Amazon CloudFront vs Microsoft

Based on 447 and 2550 real audits

View Amazon CloudFront details | View Microsoft details
MetricAmazon CloudFrontMicrosoftWinner
Performance3940Microsoft
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8786Amazon CloudFront
SEO9189Amazon CloudFront
Security6667Microsoft
TTFB263ms336msAmazon CloudFront
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Amazon CloudFront
39
Microsoft
40
Accessibility
Amazon CloudFront
89
Microsoft
89
Security
Amazon CloudFront
66
Microsoft
67
SEO
Amazon CloudFront
91
Microsoft
89
Composite
Amazon CloudFront
73
Microsoft
73

Amazon CloudFront outperforms Microsoft in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Microsoft leads in performance, security.

When to choose Amazon CloudFront

Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 447 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 2550 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon CloudFront or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon CloudFront or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon CloudFront or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon CloudFront (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon CloudFront or Microsoft?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon CloudFront or Microsoft?
Amazon CloudFront sites show lower Time to First Byte (263 ms vs 336 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon CloudFront or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback