Skip to content

Amazon CloudFront vs Recurly

Based on 419 and 1 real audits

View Amazon CloudFront details | View Recurly details
MetricAmazon CloudFrontRecurlyWinner
Performance396Amazon CloudFront
Accessibility8884Amazon CloudFront
Best Practices8781Amazon CloudFront
SEO9175Amazon CloudFront
Security6660Amazon CloudFront
TTFB240ms69msRecurly
Composite7271Amazon CloudFront
Performance
Amazon CloudFront
39
Recurly
6
Accessibility
Amazon CloudFront
88
Recurly
84
Security
Amazon CloudFront
66
Recurly
60
SEO
Amazon CloudFront
91
Recurly
75
Composite
Amazon CloudFront
72
Recurly
71

Amazon CloudFront outperforms Recurly in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Recurly leads in TTFB.

When to choose Amazon CloudFront

Choose Amazon CloudFront when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Recurly

Choose Recurly when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 419 audited Amazon CloudFront sites and 1 audited Recurly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon CloudFront or Recurly?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 6 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon CloudFront or Recurly?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon CloudFront or Recurly?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon CloudFront (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon CloudFront or Recurly?
Amazon CloudFront sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 75 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon CloudFront or Recurly?
Recurly sites show lower Time to First Byte (69 ms vs 240 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon CloudFront or Recurly for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Amazon CloudFront scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon CloudFront may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback