Based on 2 and 62 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudWatch RUM | Marketo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 29 | Amazon CloudWatch RUM |
| Accessibility | 95 | 89 | Amazon CloudWatch RUM |
| Best Practices | 79 | 79 | Tie |
| SEO | 96 | 91 | Amazon CloudWatch RUM |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Marketo |
| TTFB | 465ms | 370ms | Marketo |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | Marketo |
Amazon CloudWatch RUM and Marketo are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon CloudWatch RUM has a composite score of 70 while Marketo scores 72.
Choose Amazon CloudWatch RUM when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Marketo when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Amazon CloudWatch RUM sites and 62 audited Marketo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback