Based on 2 and 3098 real audits
| Metric | Amazon CloudWatch RUM | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 43 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 95 | 88 | Amazon CloudWatch RUM |
| Best Practices | 79 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 96 | 92 | Amazon CloudWatch RUM |
| Security | 64 | 65 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 465ms | 345ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 70 | 73 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Amazon CloudWatch RUM in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Amazon CloudWatch RUM leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Amazon CloudWatch RUM when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Amazon CloudWatch RUM sites and 3098 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback