Based on 1 and 1003 real audits
| Metric | Amazon EC2 | Amazon Route 53 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 99 | 39 | Amazon EC2 |
| Accessibility | 74 | 87 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Best Practices | 100 | 86 | Amazon EC2 |
| SEO | 83 | 91 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Security | 61 | 66 | Amazon Route 53 |
| TTFB | 50ms | 289ms | Amazon EC2 |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Amazon EC2 |
Amazon EC2 outperforms Amazon Route 53 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Amazon Route 53 leads in accessibility, SEO, security.
Choose Amazon EC2 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Amazon EC2 sites and 1003 audited Amazon Route 53 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback