Based on 1 and 432 real audits
| Metric | Amazon EC2 | Apache HTTP Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 99 | 49 | Amazon EC2 |
| Accessibility | 74 | 87 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Best Practices | 100 | 88 | Amazon EC2 |
| SEO | 83 | 90 | Apache HTTP Server |
| Security | 61 | 64 | Apache HTTP Server |
| TTFB | 50ms | 547ms | Amazon EC2 |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Amazon EC2 |
Amazon EC2 outperforms Apache HTTP Server in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Apache HTTP Server leads in accessibility, SEO, security.
Choose Amazon EC2 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Apache HTTP Server when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Amazon EC2 sites and 432 audited Apache HTTP Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback