Based on 175 and 818 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 38 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Amazon Web Services |
| TTFB | 403ms | 311ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Amazon Web Services |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Amazon ELB in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Amazon ELB leads in best practices.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 175 audited Amazon ELB sites and 818 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback