Based on 177 and 891 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Amazon Web Services | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 38 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 67 | Amazon Web Services |
| TTFB | 399ms | 335ms | Amazon Web Services |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Amazon Web Services |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Amazon ELB in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Amazon ELB leads in best practices.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 177 audited Amazon ELB sites and 891 audited Amazon Web Services sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback