Based on 173 and 1582 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 36 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon ELB |
| Best Practices | 88 | 84 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 65 | core-js |
| TTFB | 403ms | 374ms | core-js |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | core-js |
core-js outperforms Amazon ELB in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Amazon ELB leads in accessibility, best practices.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 173 audited Amazon ELB sites and 1582 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback