Skip to content

Amazon ELB vs Facebook

Based on 173 and 1407 real audits

View Amazon ELB details | View Facebook details
MetricAmazon ELBFacebookWinner
Performance3638Facebook
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8884Amazon ELB
SEO9190Amazon ELB
Security6367Facebook
TTFB403ms280msFacebook
Composite7072Facebook
Performance
Amazon ELB
36
Facebook
38
Accessibility
Amazon ELB
89
Facebook
89
Security
Amazon ELB
63
Facebook
67
SEO
Amazon ELB
91
Facebook
90
Composite
Amazon ELB
70
Facebook
72

Facebook outperforms Amazon ELB in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Amazon ELB leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose Amazon ELB

Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 173 audited Amazon ELB sites and 1407 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon ELB or Facebook?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon ELB or Facebook?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon ELB or Facebook?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon ELB (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon ELB or Facebook?
Amazon ELB sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon ELB or Facebook?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (280 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon ELB or Facebook for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon ELB may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback