Based on 176 and 2160 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 42 | Google Analytics |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | Amazon ELB |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Google Analytics |
| TTFB | 401ms | 434ms | Amazon ELB |
| Composite | 71 | 74 | Google Analytics |
Amazon ELB and Google Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon ELB has a composite score of 71 while Google Analytics scores 74.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 176 audited Amazon ELB sites and 2160 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback