Based on 176 and 4287 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 46 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon ELB |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 69 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 401ms | 360ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 71 | 75 | Google Search Console |
Google Search Console outperforms Amazon ELB in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). Amazon ELB leads in accessibility, best practices.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 176 audited Amazon ELB sites and 4287 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback