Based on 173 and 3817 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 44 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon ELB |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Amazon ELB |
| Security | 63 | 67 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 403ms | 346ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 70 | 73 | Google Search Console |
Google Search Console outperforms Amazon ELB in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Amazon ELB leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 173 audited Amazon ELB sites and 3817 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback