Based on 176 and 2813 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Google Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 41 | Google Tag Manager |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon ELB |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Amazon ELB |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 66 | Google Tag Manager |
| TTFB | 401ms | 407ms | Amazon ELB |
| Composite | 71 | 74 | Google Tag Manager |
Amazon ELB and Google Tag Manager are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon ELB has a composite score of 71 while Google Tag Manager scores 74.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 176 audited Amazon ELB sites and 2813 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback