Based on 173 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon ELB | Omniconvert | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 27 | Amazon ELB |
| Accessibility | 89 | 95 | Omniconvert |
| Best Practices | 88 | 96 | Omniconvert |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Amazon ELB |
| Security | 63 | 66 | Omniconvert |
| TTFB | 403ms | 321ms | Omniconvert |
| Composite | 70 | 73 | Omniconvert |
Omniconvert outperforms Amazon ELB in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Amazon ELB leads in performance, SEO.
Choose Amazon ELB when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Omniconvert when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 173 audited Amazon ELB sites and 1 audited Omniconvert sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback