Based on 1003 and 396 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Route 53 | AWS CloudFront | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 39 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | AWS CloudFront |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | AWS CloudFront |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Amazon Route 53 |
| TTFB | 289ms | 232ms | AWS CloudFront |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
AWS CloudFront outperforms Amazon Route 53 in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Amazon Route 53 leads in security.
Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose AWS CloudFront when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1003 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 396 audited AWS CloudFront sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback