Based on 975 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Route 53 | Cargo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 48 | Cargo |
| Accessibility | 87 | 68 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Best Practices | 86 | 100 | Cargo |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Cargo |
| Security | 65 | 58 | Amazon Route 53 |
| TTFB | 290ms | 428ms | Amazon Route 53 |
| Composite | 72 | 69 | Amazon Route 53 |
Amazon Route 53 outperforms Cargo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). Cargo leads in performance, best practices, SEO.
Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Cargo when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 975 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 1 audited Cargo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback