Skip to content

Amazon Route 53 vs HSTS

Based on 1003 and 2556 real audits

View Amazon Route 53 details | View HSTS details
MetricAmazon Route 53HSTSWinner
Performance3949HSTS
Accessibility8789HSTS
Best Practices8688HSTS
SEO9191Tie
Security6670HSTS
TTFB289ms364msAmazon Route 53
Composite7275HSTS
Performance
Amazon Route 53
39
HSTS
49
Accessibility
Amazon Route 53
87
HSTS
89
Security
Amazon Route 53
66
HSTS
70
SEO
Amazon Route 53
91
HSTS
91
Composite
Amazon Route 53
72
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms Amazon Route 53 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Amazon Route 53 leads in TTFB.

When to choose Amazon Route 53

Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1003 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Route 53 or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Route 53 or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Route 53 or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Route 53 or HSTS?
Amazon Route 53 sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Route 53 or HSTS?
Amazon Route 53 sites show lower Time to First Byte (289 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Route 53 or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Route 53 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback