Based on 1033 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Route 53 | Locomotive Scroll | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 41 | Locomotive Scroll |
| Accessibility | 87 | 81 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Best Practices | 86 | 88 | Locomotive Scroll |
| SEO | 91 | 84 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Security | 66 | 70 | Locomotive Scroll |
| TTFB | 299ms | 287ms | Locomotive Scroll |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Locomotive Scroll |
Locomotive Scroll outperforms Amazon Route 53 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Amazon Route 53 leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is SEO and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Locomotive Scroll when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1033 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 2 audited Locomotive Scroll sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback