Based on 1011 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Route 53 | Open edX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 18 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Accessibility | 87 | 96 | Open edX |
| Best Practices | 86 | 96 | Open edX |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Open edX |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Amazon Route 53 |
| TTFB | 290ms | 297ms | Amazon Route 53 |
| Composite | 72 | 70 | Amazon Route 53 |
Amazon Route 53 outperforms Open edX in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Open edX leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.
Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open edX when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1011 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 1 audited Open edX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback