Based on 1003 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Route 53 | Pagely | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 24 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Accessibility | 87 | 83 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Best Practices | 86 | 70 | Amazon Route 53 |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | Amazon Route 53 |
| Security | 66 | 63 | Amazon Route 53 |
| TTFB | 289ms | 722ms | Amazon Route 53 |
| Composite | 72 | 70 | Amazon Route 53 |
Amazon Route 53 outperforms Pagely in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Pagely leads in no categories.
Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Pagely doesn't clearly lead Amazon Route 53 in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1003 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 3 audited Pagely sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback