Skip to content

Amazon Route 53 vs Roistat

Based on 1011 and 1 real audits

View Amazon Route 53 details | View Roistat details
MetricAmazon Route 53RoistatWinner
Performance3959Roistat
Accessibility8771Amazon Route 53
Best Practices8681Amazon Route 53
SEO91100Roistat
Security6663Amazon Route 53
TTFB290ms671msAmazon Route 53
Composite7273Roistat
Performance
Amazon Route 53
39
Roistat
59
Accessibility
Amazon Route 53
87
Roistat
71
Security
Amazon Route 53
66
Roistat
63
SEO
Amazon Route 53
91
Roistat
100
Composite
Amazon Route 53
72
Roistat
73

Amazon Route 53 outperforms Roistat in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Roistat leads in performance, SEO, composite score.

When to choose Amazon Route 53

Choose Amazon Route 53 when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Roistat

Choose Roistat when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1011 audited Amazon Route 53 sites and 1 audited Roistat sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon Route 53 or Roistat?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Roistat sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon Route 53 or Roistat?
Amazon Route 53 sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon Route 53 or Roistat?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon Route 53 (87 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon Route 53 or Roistat?
Roistat sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon Route 53 or Roistat?
Amazon Route 53 sites show lower Time to First Byte (290 ms vs 671 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon Route 53 or Roistat for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Roistat scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon Route 53 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback