Based on 229 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon S3 | Antsomi CDP 365 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 15 | Amazon S3 |
| Accessibility | 89 | 81 | Amazon S3 |
| Best Practices | 84 | 69 | Amazon S3 |
| SEO | 92 | 85 | Amazon S3 |
| Security | 68 | 59 | Amazon S3 |
| TTFB | 228ms | 146ms | Antsomi CDP 365 |
| Composite | 73 | 68 | Amazon S3 |
Amazon S3 outperforms Antsomi CDP 365 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 68). Antsomi CDP 365 leads in TTFB.
Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Antsomi CDP 365 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 229 audited Amazon S3 sites and 1 audited Antsomi CDP 365 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback