Based on 224 and 10 real audits
| Metric | Amazon S3 | Arkose Labs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 39 | Arkose Labs |
| Accessibility | 89 | 94 | Arkose Labs |
| Best Practices | 84 | 88 | Arkose Labs |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 68 | 71 | Arkose Labs |
| TTFB | 225ms | 271ms | Amazon S3 |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | Arkose Labs |
Arkose Labs outperforms Amazon S3 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Amazon S3 leads in TTFB.
Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Arkose Labs when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 224 audited Amazon S3 sites and 10 audited Arkose Labs sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback