| Metric | Amazon S3 | Fondue | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 26 | Amazon S3 |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Fondue |
| Best Practices | 84 | 77 | Amazon S3 |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 68 | 73 | Fondue |
| TTFB | 228ms | 108ms | Fondue |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Amazon S3 |
Amazon S3 and Fondue are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon S3 has a composite score of 73 while Fondue scores 72.
Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Fondue when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 229 audited Amazon S3 sites and 1 audited Fondue sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback