Skip to content

Amazon S3 vs Google Analytics

Based on 224 and 1905 real audits

MetricAmazon S3Google AnalyticsWinner
Performance3741Google Analytics
Accessibility8987Amazon S3
Best Practices8485Google Analytics
SEO9291Amazon S3
Security6864Amazon S3
TTFB225ms401msAmazon S3
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Amazon S3
37
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
Amazon S3
89
Google Analytics
87
Security
Amazon S3
68
Google Analytics
64
SEO
Amazon S3
92
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Amazon S3
73
Google Analytics
73

Amazon S3 outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Amazon S3

Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 224 audited Amazon S3 sites and 1905 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon S3 or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon S3 or Google Analytics?
Amazon S3 sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Amazon S3 or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Amazon S3 (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Amazon S3 or Google Analytics?
Amazon S3 sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Amazon S3 or Google Analytics?
Amazon S3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (225 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Amazon S3 or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Amazon S3 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback