Skip to content

Amazon S3 vs Google Hosted Libraries

Based on 12 and 1 real audits

MetricAmazon S3Google Hosted LibrariesWinner
Performance3183Google Hosted Libraries
Accessibility9175Amazon S3
Best Practices8696Google Hosted Libraries
SEO9592Amazon S3
Security6963Amazon S3
TTFB302ms11msGoogle Hosted Libraries
Composite7281Google Hosted Libraries
Performance
Amazon S3
31
Google Hosted Libraries
83
Accessibility
Amazon S3
91
Google Hosted Libraries
75
Security
Amazon S3
69
Google Hosted Libraries
63
SEO
Amazon S3
95
Google Hosted Libraries
92
Composite
Amazon S3
72
Google Hosted Libraries
81

Google Hosted Libraries outperforms Amazon S3 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 72). Amazon S3 leads in accessibility, SEO, security.

FAQ

Which is faster, Amazon S3 or Google Hosted Libraries?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Hosted Libraries sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (83 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Amazon S3 or Google Hosted Libraries?
Amazon S3 sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 63 on average).
Should I choose Amazon S3 or Google Hosted Libraries for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Hosted Libraries scores higher on performance while Amazon S3 may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback