Based on 224 and 3817 real audits
| Metric | Amazon S3 | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 44 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Amazon S3 |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | Google Search Console |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Amazon S3 |
| Security | 68 | 67 | Amazon S3 |
| TTFB | 225ms | 346ms | Amazon S3 |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Amazon S3 outperforms Google Search Console in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 224 audited Amazon S3 sites and 3817 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback