Based on 244 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon S3 | jQuery Modal | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 28 | Amazon S3 |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | jQuery Modal |
| Best Practices | 85 | 96 | jQuery Modal |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | jQuery Modal |
| Security | 69 | 64 | Amazon S3 |
| TTFB | 243ms | 1224ms | Amazon S3 |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Amazon S3 and jQuery Modal are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Amazon S3 has a composite score of 74 while jQuery Modal scores 74.
Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose jQuery Modal when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 244 audited Amazon S3 sites and 1 audited jQuery Modal sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback