| Metric | Amazon S3 | Mieruca | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 35 | Amazon S3 |
| Accessibility | 89 | 82 | Amazon S3 |
| Best Practices | 84 | 77 | Amazon S3 |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Mieruca |
| Security | 68 | 59 | Amazon S3 |
| TTFB | 228ms | 868ms | Amazon S3 |
| Composite | 73 | 67 | Amazon S3 |
Amazon S3 outperforms Mieruca in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 67). Mieruca leads in SEO.
Choose Amazon S3 when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Mieruca when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 229 audited Amazon S3 sites and 1 audited Mieruca sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback