Based on 806 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | Antsomi CDP 365 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 15 | Amazon Web Services |
| Accessibility | 89 | 81 | Amazon Web Services |
| Best Practices | 87 | 69 | Amazon Web Services |
| SEO | 91 | 85 | Amazon Web Services |
| Security | 66 | 59 | Amazon Web Services |
| TTFB | 299ms | 146ms | Antsomi CDP 365 |
| Composite | 72 | 68 | Amazon Web Services |
Amazon Web Services outperforms Antsomi CDP 365 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 68). Antsomi CDP 365 leads in TTFB.
Choose Amazon Web Services when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Antsomi CDP 365 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 806 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 1 audited Antsomi CDP 365 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback