Based on 796 and 10 real audits
| Metric | Amazon Web Services | Arkose Labs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 39 | Arkose Labs |
| Accessibility | 89 | 94 | Arkose Labs |
| Best Practices | 87 | 88 | Arkose Labs |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Arkose Labs |
| Security | 66 | 71 | Arkose Labs |
| TTFB | 296ms | 271ms | Arkose Labs |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | Arkose Labs |
Arkose Labs outperforms Amazon Web Services in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Amazon Web Services leads in no categories.
Amazon Web Services doesn't clearly lead Arkose Labs in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Arkose Labs when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 796 audited Amazon Web Services sites and 10 audited Arkose Labs sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback